Financing Comprehensive Resilience Upgrades with Special Assessment Districts

This solution addresses capturing distributed resilience benefits and savings in US cities for city government and private property owners

  • Pasted graphic 3

Problem Description

Capital costs for investing in comprehensive and integrated resilient infrastructure systems are significant. Even where the benefits far outweigh project costs, often they are distributed among a wide range of direct and indirect beneficiaries from across sectors. In the face of shrinking budgets, cities need ways to motivate resilience investments on private properties and support private investment in public goods. Establishing a special assessment district that can help monetize the value of resilience upgrades and determine willingness-to-pay, can help mobilize private project developers and investors looking to install and finance resilient infrastructure projects.

Building Blocks

Story

A city’s ability to create a special assessment district that can levy taxes and/or fees offers a unique opportunity for financing comprehensive resilience upgrades. Local governments have used value capture mechanisms and borrowing against future tax revenues (i.e. tax-increment financing, TIF) or Development Impact Fees to incentivize, if not directly finance, development projects in areas with high private investment risk. These value capture mechanisms capture a portion of the value created for private property owners and developers as a result of public investments. The same mechanisms, in principle, could be applied to support private investments that similarly reduce disaster risks and/or insurance premiums across a broad area.

Photos

  • Pasted graphic 3

Resources

Contributed By

  • Elle Hempen, re:focus partners

Solution Stage

One of the 7 stages of an innovation. Learn more
STAGE SPECIALIST SKILLS REQUIRED EXAMPLE ACTIVITIES RISK LEVEL AND HANDLING FINANCE REQUIRED KINDS OF EVIDENCE GENERATED GOAL
Generating ideas2
Ideation and facilitation of creative thinking
  • Creativity methods
  • Design tools
  • Crowdsourcing
  • Open innovation
  • Awards and rewards
  • Challenge prizes
  • High failure rate should be an explicit expectation
  • Visible senior leadership essential
HIGH
  • Usually grants, occassionally convertible
LOW
A clear account of change or likely causation, supported – but not overly constrained – by evidence
An idea or set of ideas to develop and test

Key Details

Activity